<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.kai-mai.com">
<channel>
 <title>Kai Mai&#039;s Blog - Take Back the Web - Nodes for search</title>
 <link>http://www.kai-mai.com/tags/search</link>
 <description>Nodes containing the tag search</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Google Experiment - Alternate View For Search Result</title>
 <link>http://www.kai-mai.com/node/183</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Once you sign in your Google account, you can check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/experimental&quot;&gt;Google Experiment&lt;/a&gt; for potential upcoming features.
I&#039;ve tried alternate views for search results and really liked the timeline view and the map view.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Timeline view Example:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/views?q=postgresql+vs+mysql+view%3Atimeline&amp;vwdr=2008-2009&amp;btnmeta%3Dsearch%3Drestrict=Set+filter&amp;num=5&quot;&gt;postgresql vs mysql&lt;/a&gt;
I just want to see the recent comparison between postgresql and mysql.  so I can limit the timeline to show only pages from 2008 to 2009.  But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mysql/article.php/3288951&quot;&gt;Google&#039;s first result&lt;/a&gt; is definitely wrong as the article was written back in 2003.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;awTags_TagLinks&quot;&gt;Tags: &lt;a href=&quot;tags/9&quot;&gt;google&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/152&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/389&quot;&gt;timeline&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">timeline</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo! Search BOSS API FAQs</title>
 <link>http://www.kai-mai.com/node/149</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
I am a big fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/&quot;&gt;Yahoo! Search BOSS API&lt;/a&gt; as it empowers users to leverage Yahoo&#039;s search&#039;s crawler and indexes to develop applications without spending a huge amount of money on infrastructure/bandwidth!  Google, do you know what I mean?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As an observer on &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ysearchboss/&quot;&gt;the active Yahoo! Search BOSS API mailing list&lt;/a&gt;,  I document the Yahoo BOSS API&#039;s limitations which I over-hear on the mailing list: 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt; API fees and Monetization
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt; Yahoo is going to &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.yahoo.com/search/boss/fees.html&quot;&gt;charge fees on API usages beyond a certain limit&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;awTags_TagLinks&quot;&gt;Tags: &lt;a href=&quot;tags/84&quot;&gt;api&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/152&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/281&quot;&gt;yahoo_boss_api&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">api</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">yahoo_boss_api</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:35:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Has Nothing to Lose on MSN&#039;s Live Search Cashback Program</title>
 <link>http://www.kai-mai.com/node/135</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Microsoft(MS) recently introduced &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.live.com/cashback&quot;&gt;cashback&lt;/a&gt; on your purchases through participating merchants if you find your items  through MSN&#039;s Live search.
Given that Google has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-search-share-for-april-up-again-why-are-we-not-surprised/6954/&quot;&gt;gaining&lt;/a&gt;  search shares again and again, it&#039;s not surprising that people view Microsoft&#039;s move as desperate.  Well, they are trying something that have been proven to work by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ebates.com&quot;&gt;Ebates&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fatwallet.com&quot;&gt;Fatwallet&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Basically, MS has nothing much to lose in this cashback program.   They are betting that price-sensitive consumers in this recession period will want to save a few more bucks via cashback.  With a &lt;a href=&quot;http://advertising.microsoft.com/advertising/cashback?s_int=us_20080521_hp_live-search-cashback_001&quot;&gt;CPA-based pricing model&lt;/a&gt;, MS hopes E-commerce retailers will increase their spend on advertising through Live when they see more leads through Live and good conversion rates/ROI(return on investment).  MS is just giving up a little  bit of income to potentially increase their search market share and e-commerce&#039;s advertising spend.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;awTags_TagLinks&quot;&gt;Tags: &lt;a href=&quot;tags/9&quot;&gt;google&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/42&quot;&gt;live&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/152&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/231&quot;&gt;msn&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/232&quot;&gt;cashback&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">live</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">msn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">cashback</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:34:57 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google is Evil:  Your PPC Campaigns opt in Mobile Search Network by Default starting November 19, 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.kai-mai.com/node/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
According to Clikz&#039;s post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clickz.com/3627007&quot;&gt;Google Ports AdWords Listings to Its Mobile Search Product&lt;/a&gt;:
&amp;quot;Google will run listings free on Google Mobile Search pages through November 18. As of November 19, SEM buyers will have to opt out through the campaign summary page or pay for mobile clicks. While it is said ads will run across both the Web and mobile platforms, an e-mail sent to AdWords customers indicated that only ads with landing pages adaptable to mobile handsets will qualify for disbursement to the mobile search product.&amp;quot;
Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=72226&quot;&gt;the FAQ&lt;/a&gt; from Google.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;awTags_TagLinks&quot;&gt;Tags: &lt;a href=&quot;tags/9&quot;&gt;google&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/150&quot;&gt;adwords&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/151&quot;&gt;mobile&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/152&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/153&quot;&gt;ppc&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/154&quot;&gt;analytics&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;tags/155&quot;&gt;tracking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">adwords</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">search</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">ppc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">analytics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.technorati.com/tag">tracking</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:46:03 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

